TM: The power of the internet played a big part of the discussion in the various ways through which data is transferred and the potential to transfer it exists. Be it from the Zoom and...Read more
TM: Panel 1 talked of this in a stand out manner by rasing the question: who do we create this data for? Is data created for a select few who went to University? As such the subject of...Read more
TM: In Panel 2 this stood out visibly in that researchers could feel that they tend to feel invisible, unrecognized as they deal with data, give their best only to be left in the cold...Read more
TM: Working with Quotidian Data on this project gives me a bias to believe in the availability of platforms to build and create forums for discussion and produce qual data. The stand out...Read more
TM: Two things come to mind based on this from the discussion: 1. The various laws Phares mentioned that directly affect the way data is handled in this country; the Data Protection Act was...Read more
TM: Qualitative data infrastructure was touched heavily on the capacity side, for example, the readiness of institutions like university to work with qualitative data, how they deal with issues of...Read more
TM: In Panel 2, there was a mention of how data even within the McMillan library is patriarchal, so bearing this in mind, in matters qualitative data, one cannot fail to consider the...Read more
TM: I think based on the discussion they are few and far between in that we could see that there is a lack of data sharing between individuals, government institutions and even activist...Read more
TM: Institutional bureaucracy in matters surrounding qualitative data in consideration of whom this data is meant for. Considering the KEBS rep, where the discussion only centred...Read more
